napkin solutions > Ch. 64
Back to Chapter Selection
Table of Contents
Problem 64A
Problem 64B
Problem 64C
Problem 64A
#
Problem 64A.
Show that a space
𝑋
is Hausdorff if and only if the diagonal
{
(
𝑥
,
𝑥
)
|
𝑥
∈
𝑋
}
is closed in
the product space
𝑋
×
𝑋
.
Solution
by
RanolP
Let the diagonal be
𝐷
, and let
𝐷
𝐶
=
(
𝑋
×
𝑋
)
∖
𝐷
.
𝑋
is Hausdorff
⟹
diagonal is closed in the
𝑋
×
𝑋
For any
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
∈
𝐷
𝐶
, we know
𝑝
≠
𝑞
so we can use Hausdorff.
Let the open-neighborhoods of
𝑝
,
𝑞
be
𝑈
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
,
𝑉
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
where
𝑈
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
∩
𝑉
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
=
∅
.
Claim.
𝐷
𝐶
=
⋃
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
∈
𝐷
𝐶
𝑈
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
×
𝑉
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
Proof.
Since
𝑈
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
∩
𝑉
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
=
∅
, There is no
𝑧
such that
(
𝑧
,
𝑧
)
∈
𝑈
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
×
𝑉
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
.
In other words, it doesn’t contain any elements from
𝐷
.
Also, we know
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
∈
𝑈
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
×
𝑉
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
, the union must contain every
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
∈
𝐷
𝐶
.
So the union is exactly
𝐷
𝐶
.
□
By
Definition 64.3.1
,
𝑈
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
×
𝑉
(
𝑝
,
𝑞
)
is open in
𝑋
×
𝑋
.
Also (possibly infinitely many) open sets’ union is open.
Hence
𝐷
𝐶
is open and
𝐷
is closed.
□
𝑋
is Hausdorff
⟸
diagonal is closed in the
𝑋
×
𝑋
For any
(
𝑥
,
𝑦
)
∈
𝐷
𝐶
there exists an open-neighborhood for
(
𝑥
,
𝑦
)
called
𝑈
×
𝑉
.
Claim.
𝑈
∩
𝑉
=
∅
Proof.
Proof by contradiction.
Suppose
𝑈
∩
𝑉
≠
∅
, we can pick an element
𝑧
∈
𝑈
∩
𝑉
.
In other words,
(
𝑧
,
𝑧
)
∈
𝑈
×
𝑉
⊆
𝐷
𝐶
.
Contradiction.
□
For any
𝑥
≠
𝑦
, We found disjoint open-neighborhoods for them.
Hence
𝑋
is Hausdorff.
□
Referneces
Definition 64.3.1.
Given topological spaces
𝑋
and
𝑌
, the
product topology
on
𝑋
×
𝑌
is the space
whose
•
Points are pairs
(
𝑥
,
𝑦
)
with
𝑥
∈
𝑋
,
𝑦
∈
𝑌
, and
•
Topology is given as follows: the
basis
of the topology for
𝑋
×
𝑌
is
𝑈
×
𝑉
, for
𝑈
⊆
𝑋
open and
𝑉
⊆
𝑌
open.
Problem 64B
#
Problem 64B.
Realize the following spaces as CW complexes:
(a) Möbius strip.
(b)
ℝ
.
(c)
ℝ
𝑛
.
Solution
by
Jihyeon Kim (
김지현
) (
simnalamburt)
(a)
𝑋
0
=
{
𝑒
0
𝑎
,
𝑒
0
𝑏
}
𝑋
1
=
{
𝑒
1
𝑐
,
𝑒
1
𝑑
}
where
𝜕
𝑒
1
𝑐
=
{
𝑒
0
𝑎
,
𝑒
0
𝑏
}
,
𝜕
𝑒
1
𝑑
=
{
𝑒
0
𝑎
,
𝑒
0
𝑏
}
𝑋
2
=
{
𝑒
2
𝑒
}
where
𝜕
𝑒
2
𝑒
=
{
𝑒
1
𝑐
,
𝑒
1
𝑑
}
(b)
𝑋
0
=
{
…
,
𝑒
0
−
2
,
𝑒
0
−
1
,
𝑒
0
0
,
𝑒
0
1
,
𝑒
0
2
,
…
}
𝑋
1
=
{
…
,
𝑒
1
[
−
2
,
−
1
]
,
𝑒
1
[
−
1
,
0
]
,
𝑒
1
[
0
,
1
]
,
𝑒
1
[
1
,
2
]
,
…
}
where
𝜕
𝑒
1
[
𝑛
,
𝑛
+
1
]
=
{
𝑒
0
𝑛
,
𝑒
0
𝑛
+
1
}
,
(c)
TBD
Problem 64C
#
Problem 64C
†
.
Show that a finite CW complex is compact.
Solution
by
finalchild
Every
𝑘
-cell is compact.
Claim.
Finite disjoint union of quasicompact spaces is quasicompact.
Consider an open cover
{
𝑈
𝛼
}
of
𝐴
⊎
𝐵
. We denote the included indices of the finite subcovers of the projected
subcovers by
Β
𝐴
and
Β
𝐵
. There exists a finite subcover of
{
𝑈
𝛼
}
:
{
𝑈
𝛼
|
𝛼
∈
Β
𝐴
∪
Β
𝐵
}
.
Claim.
A quotient space of a quasicompact space is quasicompact.
Consider an open cover
{
𝑈
𝛼
}
of
𝑋
/
∼
. Then, let
𝑉
𝛼
=
{
𝑥
|
[
𝑥
]
∈
𝑈
𝛼
}
, and
{
𝑉
𝛼
}
is an open cover of
𝑋
. Let
Β
the included indices of the finite subcover. Then
{
𝑈
𝛼
|
𝛼
∈
Β
}
is the finite subcover of
{
𝑈
𝛼
}
.
Claim.
CW complex is Hausdorff.
Use mathematical induction. Only consider the case of making
𝑋
𝑘
from
𝑋
𝑘
−
1
Each point of
𝑋
𝑘
corresponds to either a point of
𝑋
𝑘
−
1
(we’ll call it A class) or an inner point of an
𝑒
𝑘
𝛼
(we’ll
call it B class).
Consider two distinct points of
𝑋
𝑘
,
𝑎
and
𝑏
.
If
𝑎
∈
𝑋
𝑘
−
1
and
𝑏
∈
inner
𝑒
𝑘
𝛼
(or vice versa), we can take
𝑋
𝑘
−
1
and
inner
𝑒
𝑘
𝛼
as the disjoint neighborhoods.
Similarly, it is easy to take disjoint neighborhoods if one or more of
𝑎
and
𝑏
are of class B.
If both
𝑎
and
𝑏
is of class A, since we assume
𝑋
𝑘
−
1
is Hausdorff, we have disjoint open neighborhoods
𝑆
𝑎
and
𝑆
𝑏
. Because the attaching map is continuous, the preimage of the equiv relation gives two distinct open
neighborhoods in
𝑋
𝑘
.
Thus, a finite CW complex is compact.
∎